I have no problem with people being fined for littering but there are legitimate questions to ask about the way this policy is being enforced and whether it possibly has more to do with raising money than tackling the underlying causes of littering.
We know the overwhelming majority of fines relate to cigarette litter. The minutes from the Environment Overview and Scrutiny Committe of November 30th last year confirm this (see page 5). The report states that "80-85% of fines issued were to do with cigarette litter"
The sums raised are substantial with £95,000 raised in a single month according to this report. How much of this leaks out of the borough to Kingdom's owners?
I asked for a break down of fines issued by ward. I didn't quite get that but the information below is, nevertheless, instructive. It shows Birkenhead way ahead of all other areas with over 50% of all the fines issued coming from the Birkenhead area. Wallasey comes next. This means that the overwhelming amount of money raised is coming the poorest parts of the borough. Of course these may also be the areas with the biggest litter problem. But, where is the evidence that fining predominantly low income smokers makes a meaningful contribution to reducing litter on our streets?
The figures below show the number of fines issued for littering in Wirral by Kingdom Resources since its contract with Wirral Council commenced in July 2015. The total number of fines issued is 18,047.
| Bebington 535 |
| Bidston 290 |
| Birkenhead 7237 |
| Birkenhead & Tranmere 431 |
| Bromborough 1657 |
| Clatterbridge 5 |
| Claughton 51 |
| Eastham 59 |
| Egremont 1 |
| Frankby 5 |
| Greasby 8 |
| Heswall 278 |
| Hoylake 104 |
| Irby 4 |
| Leasowe 67 |
| Liscard 584 |
| Meols 16 |
| Moreton 808 |
| New Brighton 1549 |
| New Ferry 11 |
| Oxton 18 |
| Pensby 34 |
| Port Sunlight 4 |
| Prenton 196 |
| Rock Ferry 849 |
| Seacombe 316 |
| Spital 2 |
| Thingwall 2 |
| Thurstaston 3 |
| Tranmere 311 |
| Upton 784 |
| Wallasey 1564 |
| West Kirby 244 |
| Woodchurch 20 |
The notion of "aggressive enforcement" sits well with the career history of Wirral Council's very much IN FAVOUR Martin Liptrot, pretend 'non-political' appointee to the council's image and reputation management programme.
ReplyDeleteNon-smoker Liptrot, was once paid handsomely to transform 'steaming cow pats' into objects of desire, concealing the lethal threat of ciggies from third world smokers beneath a cloak of deceit, not only pleasing the crooked execs on the board of Philip Morris, but stuffing his wallet and proving to us he was dangerously unprincipled, cutting a swathe through poverty-stricken third world citizens, creating orphans and shortening the lives of millions of gullible people suffering genuine hardship.
It's merely the next incarnation of his gruesome career, to hit the pockets and thereby the survival prospects of the already hard-pressed, austerity-clobbered citizens of Birkenhead.
Frank will be pleased, being a despiser of 'the feckless poor'.